How often was training conducted in the department involved in Popow v City of Margate?

In the case of Popow v. City of Margate, the training conducted by the department was outlined as occurring every ten years. This long interval stands out because training frequency is crucial in ensuring that law enforcement personnel remain adept and knowledgeable in the use of firearms and other critical skills necessary for their roles. Regular training helps to reinforce proper techniques, improve response to stress situations, and ensure adherence to updated policies and procedures.

The significance of training duration is highlighted in this case, as infrequent training may lead to skill degradation and reduced effectiveness in the field. Training should typically be more frequent, as regular and consistent practice is essential for maintaining proficiency and operational readiness in law enforcement.